Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Emmanuel Fuentes's avatar

Touche, Crosby! This is some elite writing, starting off with that extended bridge analogy to get to the trade.

It's easy to say know that is was a bad trade, but, at the moment, as excited a we were about Contreras, the reality was that we were getting a more established and complete player in Murphy.

I've always felt that part of it has been the way the Braves have handle Murphy. The d'Arnaud/Contreras duo was so successful as a shared catcher position instead of the traditional staying catcher/ back up catcher, that the Braves feel in love with the dynamic. But there are baseball players that don't work like that (it could be argued that most, since baseball is a sport where routine and stability is key). I believe Murphy is better suited for a traditional everyday catching role.

Injuries have been the main obstacle to him getting an opportunity to be an everyday catcher, but managing has been a part of it too. His successor being so good, so fast, also has some part in it.

Tom Lamoureux's avatar

I agree with Emmanuel… elite writing!

Several lessons to bear in mind as the clamor for AA to make moves this off-season grows. Here are my top 2 takeaways: 1. Every move carries risk, especially injury risk. Big $ acquisitions (especially at oft-injuried positions like pitcher) are big risks. 2. Getting the right staff to develop players at the minor AND major league is more important than ever. Development can’t stop once a player gets to the big leagues.

No posts

Ready for more?