Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Harrelson's avatar

1. How would it affect a team's tv ad sales, ticket sales, jerseys/hats/etc., when they get rid of a big time player only 45-games into a season?

2. What does that do to fan interest when an ownership gives up on its players 45-games into a new season?

3. What does it do to fan interest when players continue to be traded around?

Why do we have a minor league system if 99% of the players will come FROM OTHER TEAMS? Why not cut out that expense and CANCEL minor league expense? Spend that money on quality at the major league level?

What happened to showing faith in YOUNG talent, bringing THEM up in lieu of simply swapping old, worn out players for other old, worn out players? To me, this is a decision on "how will we run this team". Will we develop within? In other words, do your dealing at the High-A level and AA level in lieu of swapping a "brown kettle" for a "brown pot" at major league level? And get the coaches who can make them better. And do this in lieu of signing a career .235 hitter for $11MM/year who can't even hit lefties. Or winding up with a Bummer who is obviously (and has been since last year) not just past his prime, but fully cooked. The loser acquisitions swimming in the cess pool of "old and worn out" has been the norm for the Braves since 2021. I vote "develop".

Just my opinion.

Tom Lamoureux's avatar

On SPs… Go with the young guys. My recollections are that Ritchie (and this year’s Fuentes) look as good, if not better than AJSS, Schwellenbach and Waldrep in their first few ML starts. Dangerous to rely on my memory, but as a reminder Schwellenbach had a 5.74 ERA in his first 6 starts when he came up.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?