Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom Lamoureux's avatar

Thanks for a thoughtful discussion on Braves SP situation. Glad to see you’ve not gone full panic and blame mode before the first SP game. Hoping both Schwellenbach and Waldrep will be back quickly and without impact on effectiveness. I’m getting lonely, but continue to believe signing FA SPs is a fool’s errand in today’s game. I see the 2 Braves unfortunate injuries as reasons why you shouldn’t be chasing after SPs with $ or prospects. The risk of injury is too high and unpredictable. The track record is clear - look at last year’s SP FA results… you want Burnes for 6 yrs and $210 million? He pitched 64 innings to a 2.0 WAR in the 1st year of that contract. Or maybe Blake Snell. He threw 64 innings to a 1.3 WAR for $36.4 million last year. Or I know, we should’ve signed Nola when he was a FA…he’s a workhorse, never injuried. He pitched 94 innings with a -0.3 WAR. Almost every Braves commentator is shouting: “Sign an SP!” It’s easy to say, but bring the data that shows it’s an effective solution. Oh but the Dodgers - they won the WS after they spend a literal fortune on SPs. Really? That’s why they won? They had the 16th best ERA in MLB.

Tom Lamoureux's avatar

… correcting…Buidling, hopefully, one of the best bullpens in baseball and using a disproportionate number of high draft picks on pitchers are moves AA has made to position the pitching staff for success. SPs are still critical, but a team has to use the entire staff to get 9 outs (including guys in the minors) over the course of a season. SPs continue to pitch less. Over the last decade their share of IP has declined by more than 10%.

9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?