Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JimK's avatar

Andruw gave me many hours of joy by running down flies for Maddux, Glavine, and Smoltz during our best years. So I hope he'll get in. Here are the reasons why I'd be reluctant to vote for him (but might anyway) were I an actual voter bound by pure objectivity:

(1) the Mazeroski precedent; I don't like it. Maz was a truly great fielding 2B, but the hitting was way below HOF standards. One big WS AB isn't enough. Normalized for era, Dave Bancroft at SS is also questionable. I'm not saying toss Maz, Bancroft, and, in the inverse, Baines. What's done is done. We let top DHs in, but signficantly glove first is a flawed credential.

(2) a different character question, one we fans can relate to: gluttony. Andruw was said to love junk food, and certainly showed it as he declined from top ranging CF to fat LF/DH, a .214/.314/.420 batter in his 30's. Fat is a character flaw when you're paid millions to keep in shape! Maybe Health Secretary RFK, Jr. should attend Andruw's induction in Cooperstown to say "all is forgiven." Have Andruw do PSAs encouraging kids to just say no to fats and carbs.

Domestic abuse is a serious matter. If it were closely tracked throughout MLB history and not just in this era, who else would be disqualified? At what point should it force a Cooperstown ban? On a first offense? Doesn't reconciliation count? Character should. If those 51 homers in 2005 got even a little help from PEDs, I'd be a firm "no." Absent evidence, not guilty.

Tom Lamoureux's avatar

Great points! I have always thought that as long as baseball writers are responsible for the initial admission to the HoF, the bigger media markets in the northeast have a disproportionate impact on elections. If Andruw had been a Yankee (or Met, Red Sox,…) would he already be in the HoF? I wonder.

No posts

Ready for more?